Home » REVIEWS » PS3 REVIEWS » Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Review

Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Review

Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Review

There’s no clever or cute way to start this review. Really, there isn’t. Nothing that can quite convey the devastating effect The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim will have on your free time and free will. Looking at the almost pathetic excuses we’ve used thus far to avoid social engagements (“I, erm, I… sorry, no” followed by hanging up has been quite effective) and the complete neglect for anything else in our lives, we’re surprised Skryim doesn’t come with a warning of some sort. Forget Grand Theft Auto and the like – Daily Mail’s been aiming its ire at the wrong target all these years.

“But Play!” you cry. “Isn’t Skyrim just some nonsense about trolls and goblins?” Time for an education. Let’s start at the beginning. Sentenced to execution, Skyrim opens as you’re carted off to die in solemn fashion. Having seen one of the other prisoners decapitated in front of you, you’re next on the chopping block when a dragon shows up and all hell breaks loose. Given their status as a legendary creature in Tamriel, and the whole fire-breathing shtick they have, chaos ensues and you break free.

Recounting story is hardly the fist-slamming, blood-pumping way to kick off a review you’d want for a game that’s scored 93 (admit it, you’ve already looked at the score) but it’s necessary here, as the intro is the only part of Skyrim guaranteed to be shared by all. Once you escape the fiery ashes of what would have been your final resting place, how the rest of the game plays out is up to you. With its freeform structure and ridiculous amount of distractions through side-quests and exploration, you could play for hours, days, weeks, months without ever troubling the main storyline, leaving the Greybeards awaiting your arrival to die of boredom and arthritis.

The emphasis, as with all Elder Scrolls games, is on choice. Choice has become a trendy byword in games development recently but in Skyrim, choice really is choice. Not choose-the-blue-paragon-answer-or-the-naughty-red answer (don’t send angry emails Mass Effect fans – we still love you) but actual, tangible choice with where you go, what you look like, how you play and what you do. That starts with your first cautious steps of exploration and the first surprise is how Skyrim’s map initially feels fairly small and quite bland. Extended play shows this is to be the result you starting your adventure in a town by the largest, emptiest field in the entire game. A strange decision then but once you start exploring the snowy mountains, shipwrecks on beaches, abandoned caves, spooky swamps and medieval forts, it’s one you quickly forgive and forget.

The combat is simplicity married to endless nuance. That’s our fancy way of saying you can mash the shoulder buttons at the most basic, sausage-thumbed level but there are other factors influencing battles such as your stamina, the enemy you’re up against, the area you’re in and so on. Narrow corridors? Lead them towards you. Guard hiding behind shield? Let them swing first and get in your own blow while they’re exposed. Dragon? Just bloody run.

Even then, your choice of playing style will lead to further tactical considerations. Those who build themselves as swashbuckling tanks with paranoid eyeballs peeping through a wall of steel armour may want to specialise in blocking and forging their own weapons rather than, say, lock-picking and enchanting. Archers will naturally want to opt for sneaking, while dabbling in alchemy ensures poisons are always on hand to be applied to their arrows. Those going down the magic route have a wealth of options with their spells from raising the undead to mass paralysis.

And this is before you even take into consideration further specialist routes – assassins can stick to shadows and use juicy backstab buffs to clear their path, wizards can turn invisible like a cheap circus magician to avoid conflict and the indecisive can dual wield a spell in one hand and weapon in the other. The choice, as they say and as we’re at pains to point out, is yours.

What’s smart is that your development in Skyrim is natural, with your skills leveling up the more you use them.  This neatly avoids the RPG pratfall of ticking character progression boxes you later regret – you can only build a character in the way you’re playing. RPGs of this nature can also suffer from endless micro-management and Bethesda has done well to trim away at some of the fat. Weapons and armour no longer degrade through use so you don’t have to keep checking and repairing while conversations can be influenced by bribing, intimidation, persuasion or bare-fist brawling rather than Oblivion’s bizarre Trivial Pursuit wheel with comedy facial reactions.

In short, everything from the interface to the menus have been overhauled for ease of use. In less short, through Skyrim, Bethesda has finally found a way of streamlining its Elder Scrolls series for consoles without losing any of the qualities that makes this feel like the huge built-for-a-nuclear-powered-PC RPG it is at heart.

The only real clue left to the heritage of the series is the cumbersome nature of the Favourites sub-menu. Designed as a way to quickly let you switch weapons, spells or armour on the fly to save a trip to the main inventory menus, it doesn’t actually prove any quicker than simply exhaling and taking the slightly longer trek to said menu. Likewise, it takes a few I-wanted-the-quest-journal-not-the-map mishaps before the controls become second nature. After a while, it’s easy to take for granted how easy it is to play Skyrim.

You’ll also take for granted how absorbed you become in Skyrim’s world. Selling a world of trolls, goblins and ye olde fantasy lore to a generation of gamers reared on steroid shooters can’t be an easy task – you only have to recall the forsooths and mayhaps of Two Worlds to remember what happens when this goes wrong.

Yet Skyrim never flirts with accidental comedy as it’s so fully committed to weaving the illusion of a believable world in a long lost era that you’ll be pulled along with it. When Greybeards speak to you in dragon tongue – yes, this actually happens – it’s something you fully embrace, not something to be looked up on Youtube to emailed around under a ‘lol this is dumb’ heading the next day.

What helps sell the illusion is the world itself is far more believable. Skyrim’s Tamriel has geography dictate your passage through cliffs, mountains and waterfalls as much as the black and white arrow on your compass does. Oblivion tried this trick too but the difference is the landscape doesn’t feel as forced, mostly because you have believable obstructions rather than vertically stretched land with textures pulled to breaking point blocking your path.

Likewise, characters you interact with are no longer relegated to horrifying mannequins with moving mouths. They’ll stop arguments amongst themselves and apologise when you draw near, finger places on the map they want you to visit, point out mountains in the distance and the like. While all this is happening, the weather cycles through clear mornings, rainy afternoons, red dawns and star-dotted nights. The mystery of Skyrim’s storyline pulls you all over Tamriel, Bethesda as happy for you to play virtual tourist as you are spell-casting adventurer.

While those story hoops are fun to jump through, with its linear path ensuring spectacular set-pieces and scripted moments are quietly woven into its fabric without you noticing, the side-quests and small stories that connect them are what really form the heart of Skyrim’s adventure.

It’s the Dark Brotherhood assassin you find crouching in a forest to ambush you, carrying a death warrant with your name on it. It’s the ghost of a child who dies in a mysterious housefire, playing hide and seek before giving you crucial information on what really happened. It’s the treasure maps that are actual treasure maps, giving you pictures of landmarks and dotted lines leading to a red X. It’s the statue that beams you to the skies of Tamriel for a conversation, the threat of falling to your death underpinning its demands of you.

Most impressive of all, dragons aren’t just wheeled out for the sake of drama in the storyline. Bethesda let them roam free throughout Tamriel, a constant threat to the idle adventurer. In one brilliant moment that sums up all of Skyrim’s strengths, we ventured out of town picking flowers (for potions… don’t judge us) when the shadow of a dragon flashed past the snowberries we were reaching for. The pad rumbled as a huge roar could be heard in the distance.

Breathing fire across the dense forest we were cowering in, the dragon gave chase as we ran back to the village we just left. Upon seeing the dragon above them blocking out the sun, the villagers ran inside their homes while the guards came out in full force, firing arrows at the beast. After a five-minute battle the dragon fell and the guards stood around the fallen creature in shock, asking if it’s really dead and if they did really have slayed a dragon. This is a small drama we essentially created ourselves by leading the dragon back to the village, partly to see what would happen, mostly because we were being massive cowards. Bethesda, always one step ahead, accounted for this possibility and hearing the guards talking about the event after the fact makes it feel personal.

Not every lesson has been learnt from Oblivion. That game saw Bethesda shooting for The Dullest Opening Hour In Videogames award, as you trudged around after Patrick Stewart for an hour while his knees creaked and he mumbled about the jaws of Oblivion. Skyrim is courteous enough that you begin its adventure in fresh air rather than the putrid browns of Oblivion’s sewers but it still locks you on rails as you’re walked through the controls. A necessary evil given the dizzying scope of the adventure but an evil nevertheless. Likewise, while Skyrim doesn’t suffer from any fatal glitches there are a few moments where you can see the gamecode being stretched tighter than it can handle over the huge landscape – some see-through forest floors, transparent rocks and the like.

Yet if those are both the price to pay for a game this good, it’s worth the cost. Skyrim builds open everything Oblivion did well and makes a mockery of those who made excuses for that game, as Bethesda has shown it’s possible to make a game this broad, this ambitious and this big without having to make concessions elsewhere. Brilliant in every way – just remember to fix your social circle once you’re done. If you ever get done, that is…

Building upon everything that made Oblivion such a joy, Skyrim has easily secured the crown as the biggest game this gen and also as one of the best. Even if you don’t ordinarily like ye olde fantasy RPGs, this is brilliant.


Similar posts

  • Conor

    Great review and I cant wait to play this game!!!

  • Pingback: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim reviews rounded up — Gematsu()

  • Pingback: Skyrim, o mais novo candidato a jogo do ano pede passagem – Game Generation | PlayStation 3 PlayStation Vita PSN PSP | Notícias Fórum Reviews Guias de Troféus |()

  • Pingback: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Review Round Up (UPDATE: Metacritic score hits 95) - GamingBolt.com: Video Game News, Reviews, Previews and Blog()

  • Sean

    Why does this review by Ryan King in PlayUK give a score of 93/10, whereas the same review, by the same reviewer on Nowgamer gives a score of 9.4/10?

    Where has the extra percentage point come from, or gone, from one source to the other??

  • Pswi60guy

    which version of the game is the review based on? id prefer to get it on ps3, is that a wise decision?

  • Ryan King

    Sean – That’s a question for NowGamer. I reviewed it for Play, gave it 93 for Play, it’ll get 93 in the published review when that hits the shelves.

    Pswi60guy – PS3. It doesn’t really matter which version you get it on though, no real difference between the two.

  • Sean

    Ryan – thanks for the clarification, appreciated. Great review too. 🙂

  • Ryan King

    Thanks 🙂

  • Adam

    Hi Ryan,

    Great review, i know you tested it as an archer, which is the way i want to play it from start to finish. You mention that its difficult to begin with due to low specific skill ratings, but can that be over come by actively seeking out the teachers of stealth?

    Also as an archer, particularly once eagle eye has been achieved, does the game encourage stealth if thats the path you choose, or is it rubbish?

  • Ryan King

    Hey Adam,

    You -could- overcome teething problems an archer by seeking out a stealth teacher… but (and I’m guessing here) I still think it would be difficult. The reason archery gets easier, as well as leveling up skills, is that through experience you start to understand how the AI/stealth system works and that makes a pretty big difference. It’s hard to say really!

    However, in the first town you start in (River… something, can’t remember the name), there’s someone who you can pay to level up Archery. He hangs around by the wood mill near the town’s entrance and has a bow on his back. Also, when you complete the missions for the ruler in Dragonreach, one of the awards you are bracers which give you a 30% damage bonus with Bows.

    “Also as an archer, particularly once eagle eye has been achieved, does the game encourage stealth if thats the path you choose, or is it rubbish?”

    Hard to say whether the game as a whole encourages stealth, as it probably depends on your character build, but I’m around level 25-30 as a stealth/archer build and I can stealth my way through entire missions/caves/forts/whatever. Stealth is definitely a viable option and probably the only real way to play an archer anyway, as you get a x3 bonus for Sneak attacks. I’d say 80% of enemies die in 1-2 arrows when you’re hidden, it’s only when you’re spotted that you run into trouble… and Dragon Shouts help a lot with close encounters 🙂

  • Aima

    do you have to have played the previous elder scrolls games to play this one?

  • Ryan King

    Nope. Skyrim works just as well as a standalone game as it does an Elder Scroll sequel.

  • Pingback: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, voti altissimi da ogni parte del mondo!()

  • Pingback: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, voti altissimi da ogni parte del mondo! | Jobbr it()

  • Pingback: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, voti altissimi da ogni parte del mondo! | TEST()

  • Pingback: Around the web: Skyrim edition | MensaDad News()

  • Patrick

    Great review, as always with Play, but, if Skyrim can get a compliment as amazing as this:

    “Building upon everything that made Oblivion such a joy, Skyrim has easily secured the crown as the biggest game this gen and also as one of the best. Even if you don’t ordinarily like ye olde fantasy RPGs, this is brilliant”

    Why is it only rated 93%? In the low 90s as supposed to, say, Fallout 3 which is 97%? And only 2% better than Oblivion, even though, having played both Oblivion and Skyrim myself, its a huge improvement?

    I don’t mean to criticize your review, I would just like to know your justification for the 93% 🙂

  • Ryan King

    Hey Patrick,

    There’s no easy answer for that question and it’s something we’ve been talking about a LOT on Play recently (what with all the big releases right now).

    You’ve already pointed out the main problem I had when deciding on the score for Skyrim, as Oblivion got 91% and Fallout 3 97%. Those scores were decided by different reviewers, as the Play team at that time was different (personally, I agree with the Oblivion score but think the Fallout 3 score is too high). So if Skyrim is better than Fallout 3 – which I think it is – and if we’re using review scores to definitively say one game is better than another, then Skyrim could only score 98%, 99% or 100%. That’s a ridiculous score by any standard and especially so for a game which does still have problems, even though it’s obviously very, very, very good.

    But ultimately, I don’t think review scores work like that. They capture how good a game is at that time. Would Warhawk be scored as highly now as when it was first released? Or Tekken 6? Or Killzone 2? Probably not. Even Fallout 3 wouldn’t score as highly nowadays, I wouldn’t think (and Skyrim would be partially responsible for that, showing what is possible in an open-world Bethesda game without any obvious visual concessions).

    That’s why it’s unfair to compare scores in that way, even though I understand scores will inevitably be compared in the way you’ve pointed out.

    So for Skyrim, I decided to score it not against the history of Play scores, which I think is flawed, but against the other big name releases. That gives a much clearer picture of the Play pecking order – Batman: Arkham City was the only other game to score over 90% with Battlefield 3, Modern Warfare 3, Saints Row: The Third, Assassin’s Creed Revelations, etc all scoring below that. Our recent review scores tell you that Skyrim and Batman: Arkham City are the standout picks of the recent releases. So when review scores -are- compared in this way, I think that’s when they work and serve as a decent metric on what to buy. Although it helps that we write 1,600 odd words to go with said score, obviously :p

    Like I said – no easy answer to your question! But I hope this helps explain things and the nature of Play’s review scores generally 🙂

  • Patrick

    Thanks Ryan!

    Really appreciate you replying!

    I agree with what you’re saying about it being unfair to compare Skyrim to other games, especially when you consider their release dates, so thanks for pointing that out!

    And yes, 98% + is far too high given its glitches (namely involving trolls!) and loading screens, also it being one of the best releases this year is another good point. It’s nice to seem such a wonderful game receive that accolade. Anyone reading that review would definitely feel inclined to but it :p

    So yeah now 93% does sound more justified and it’s interesting to hear you say you believe the previous scoring of the games is corrupt! I also respects that Play is bold enough to have different opinions to other critics, making your reviews more interesting.

    Thanks again, and I shall continue to buy Play 🙂

  • Pingback: Around the web: Skyrim edition()

  • Ryan King

    Haha, I wouldn’t and didn’t say ‘corrupt’! My own personal view is that it was scored too high. Not by much – Fallout 3 is still a brilliant game – just perhaps not 97% brilliant 🙂

  • Patrick

    Oh yeah whoops, you said ‘flawed’ :p

    True, although I still think Skyrim should be 95%, just saying 🙂

  • Rhys

    Nice review Ryan,

    I have the game so i dont know why im here reading your review, i guess i just wanted to read others opinions on this game.

    But i did just want to say something about elder scrolls games, to be honest i wasnt a fan and never played any previous games. Until i finally got my hands on Oblivion (in 2010, a little late i know) which again i could never really ‘get into’. But when i got my hands on Skyrim on release date (yes i was taking a gamble on this game) i was in love with it in every way, im going to stop going on now, but i had to tell you how surprised i am and if anybody is on the fence as to whether you should get this game, get it!. 🙂

  • Henry

    it feels like a giant national park 🙂

  • Pingback: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (Playstation 3) |()

  • Pingback: Around the web: Skyrim edition | Bethesda Blog()