Really didn’t enjoy playing The History
Channel: Great Battles Of Rome. It’s
not a good RTS and it’s not a very good
history lesson either. In fact, you’d be
better off watching
300 again at least
there’s weird
mutants in that.
SCORE
25/MAY/07
46%
CLICK ON A THUMBNAIL TO PREVIEW
This is madness!” “This is Sparta!” “Our
arrows will blot out the sun.” “Then we
will fight in the shade.” “The farmers
are revolting.” “Then we shall shuffle forward
in our respective squads and…” and… well
that’s all really. And we mean ‘really’.
According to 300, Spartans were
awesome. According to The History Channel:
Great Battles Of Rome the Romans were
tiny regimented groups with little idea
how to fight or what would make a good
starting position on the battlefield. Before
each battle, you can upgrade your troops
and enlist more soldiers – this bit isn’t very
interesting but it can give some of your
troops a +2 chance of avoiding attacks.
Next up is positioning your squads on the
battlefield, is this interesting? Nope. And
then when you finally start a battle and
you fight with the controls to get everyone
rushing at the enemy squads do the interest
and fun appear? Nope.
All you do is ram your boys into theirs and
wait until you’ve killed a sufficient number
or until enough enemies have run away, and
you win. But then – get this – you have to do
that all over again. There might be slightly
more or slightly better equipped enemies,
but the rush tactics seems to work on
everything. Unless it’s Hannibal’s elephants
we guess. We didn’t get that far but it might
take more than a squad of skirmishers and
potato farmers to take them out.
Imagine Publishing Ltd, Richmond House, 33 Richmond Hill, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH2 6EZ
Registered company 5374037 (England) : VAT No 864 6042 18
Directors: Damian Butt, Steven Boyd, Mark Kendrick, Alistair Ramsay, Harry Dhand, Andrew Hartley, Sam Watkinson